Post by CAPTAIN SILVERICA on Jul 8, 2011 16:30:23 GMT -5
So suggestions on who we kill and who we recruit?
This is AMERICA damn it, we do things democratically!
BTW, we may want to recruit a low profile guy whose good. Off the top of my hand, I like Corn, IR, JacinB, and maybe Pax, but Pax's participation seems to be kinda bad of late.
I'd love to get Darq or Get, but they may be JKed tonight for protection.
Rokk may actually be the best move cause if he's lynched or NK'd (and autopsies as mafia) it will sorta clear K-ness & KOBO, and if they're lynched it will sorta clear him too.
Post by Skywolf Bossy on Jul 8, 2011 17:31:52 GMT -5
Yeah, good idea. Get is risky as a recruit, because people like killing him. However, whoever we recruit needs to be someone pushing the lynch on me or K-Ness so that when either of us dies and turn up scum, that person we recruited is cleared for outing scum.
Post by Diamond Ness on Jul 9, 2011 1:45:17 GMT -5
I think get might be a neutral. We need to come up with an action, though. We're running out of time. I won't be here in the morning since I have to take care of stuff with the accident, so what ever is decided, I'm okay with.
Post by CAPTAIN SILVERICA on Jul 9, 2011 2:05:30 GMT -5
How do these actions look:
SL: JK Kobo K-ness: MD IR Quebs: Clue Cop Darq Cure1987: MD/Track Get_1 KOBO: 1 Shot SuperNK on Rokk or JacinB
Thoughts? Rokk & Jacin are the 2 biggest pressurers IMO, so one of them needs to go, but they're also good recruit targets so we need to consider either one also.
Sounds good to me. You can make the call on whether or not to recruit and kill which one, doesn't matter to me...but can recruiting be blocked by a town JK'er? I'd think Rokk would be a great candidate on their side to get protection, that is my only concern, I don't want the one shot recruitment to fail.
Post by Diamond Ness on Jul 9, 2011 11:26:55 GMT -5
Didn't notice his time listing in the thread. I would rather kill Rokk as Jacin hasn't been as vocal. Rokk annoyed me with his constant meta-gaming of "Your character wasn't in the issue time-frame." Which, while likely true, would be a death sentence for anyone using the fake claim given to us.